- WSU lecture series to present ‘Climate Extremes’ wine symposiumPosted 8 hours ago
- Reustle wins 5 double golds at San Francisco Chronicle wine judgingPosted 5 days ago
- Ste. Michelle brands ride tall at Houston rodeo judgingPosted 5 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition draws 6,850 entriesPosted 1 week ago
- Paterson takes Tantalus Vineyards to another levelPosted 1 week ago
- Oregon Riesling, we wish there was morePosted 1 week ago
- Oregon Tempranillo Celebration adds public tastingPosted 2 weeks ago
- Photojournalist looks back at 2016 vintage in Northwest winePosted 2 weeks ago
- Washington Malbec on the risePosted 2 weeks ago
- Ag Expo seminar features Woodward Canyon’s second generationPosted 3 weeks ago
Who’s No. 1 for Riesling?
Washington is the unabashed U.S. leader in Riesling production and acreage, thanks to Ste. Michelle Wine Estates and its flagship winery, Chateau Ste. Michelle.
But where does Washington stand in the world of Riesling? Fifth, according to the latest stats. Here some global acreage numbers, according to the International Riesling Foundation:
- Pfalz (Germany): 13,756
- Mosel (Germany): 13,082
- Rheinhessen (Germany): 9,766
- Alsace (France): 8,367
- Washington (USA): 7,864
- South Australia (Australia): 7,213
- Rheingau (Germany): 6,108
- Wurttemburg (Germany): 5,098
- California (USA): 4,147
- Niederosterreich (Austria): 3,800
- Nahe (Germany): 2,829
- Baden (Germany): 2,805
- New Zealand: 2,493
- Ontario (Canada): 1,925
- South Africa: 1,178
- Victoria (Australia): 1,102
- New South Wales (Australia): 1,008
- Chile: 823
- Oregon (USA): 797
- Franken (Germany): 788
- Mittelrhein (Germany): 759
- New York (USA): 700
- Western Australia (Australia): 692
- Michigan (USA): 595
- Hessiche Bergstrasse (Germany): 511
- British Columbia (Canada): 439
As we can see, Germany is still (and will always remain) the big dog for Riesling production, followed by Alsace. Meanwhile, Australia is another strong Riesling region, not only in quantity but also in quality.
It is interesting to see some of the United States’ strong, up-and-coming regions (New York, Oregon and Michigan) still are small in acreage. And it’s actually a bit surprising that California has that much Riesling, as we rarely hear about it.
And British Columbia, a powerhouse in quality (thanks to such producers as Wild Goose, JoieFarm and Gehringer Brothers) is actually quite diminutive in production. One must believe there is plenty of opportunity for growth in the Okanagan Valley and the Similkameen Valley.
Meanwhile, Washington’s growth is strong. The numbers above are 2012 reports. As recently as 2010, Washington’s Riesling acreage was 6,320, about 14.4 percent of the state’s total wine grapes. That year, Washington crushed 33,500 tons of Riesling, or 20.9 percent of the total harvest – which also means Riesling’s tons per acre are higher than the average (it’s no secret that Riesling can carry high tonnage and maintain superb quality).
In 2011, a small year for Washington because of cold temperatures and winter vine damage, Riesling added up to 31,700 tons and accounted for 22.3 percent of the total crop. And Riesling has been Washington’s No. 1 grape three out of the last four years.